Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change?
The importance of replacing small shops for large shopping malls, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of large shopping malls are replacing small shops has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend on the whole society in recent years. It can be agreed that large shopping malls play a vital role in the whole society, although it has drawbacks. This essay will elaborate on how large shopping malls bring more investment and how it causes inconvenient transportations and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerable reasons why large shopping malls are better for the city but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that large shopping malls bring more investment to the area. As an illustration, huge shops can support more number of stores, consequently, it will perform more brands, generate more jobs and expand the flow of people playing a vital role in the community. Therefore, large shopping malls should replace small shops.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that large shopping malls take some negative impact on the whole society as there are innumerable reasons but the most salient one is that inconvenient transportations. For instance, After small shops are being replaced by large malls, John’s father said he needs to spend over one and a half hour to buy some fruits in the nearest large shopping malls. Thus, large shopping malls take some negative impact on people.
In conclusion, from what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that large shopping malls are replacing small shops is prominent, although inconvenient transportation should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26164874552 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83580732118 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508960573477 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1735798608 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.454545455 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.18181818182 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305130380075 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155152661084 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820970951661 0.071462118173 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206684085345 0.151781067708 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486297792825 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.