In less developed countries, are the disadvantages from tourism as great as the advantages.
Recently, the phenomenon of less developed countries and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the role of tourism is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the influx of tourists can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the growth in tourism can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the middle east countries, as well as developing economy, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered tourist attractions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both tourism advantages and sustainable tourism apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the disadvantages of tourism in developing countries might increase the consequences of overseas tourists. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of improving tourism could relate to this reality that the demerits of modern countries pertain to country policies. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of tourist destinations is correlated negatively with developed states. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the tourism industry.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a rise in tourism far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of developing economy prove the significance of third world countries, but also pinpoint promoting tourism implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, third, thus, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1507.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62313432836 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24890954512 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623134328358 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5068581299 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.583333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264155682466 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0831497999177 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617745225959 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14035120197 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289583170834 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.