In less developed countries, are the disadvantages from tourism as great as the advantages.
Recently, the phenomenon of the tourism industry and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of less developed countries is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that tourist trading can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, a rise in tourism can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of improving the local economy, as well as the local culture, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between overseas tourists and souvenir shops. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both tourist attractions and traditional customs apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, developing countries might increase the consequences of negative environmental effects. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of ecological balance could relate to this reality that the demerits of greenhouse gas emissions pertain to non-biodegradable waste. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of tourism drawbacks is correlated negatively with waste disposal. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of sustainable tourism.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the growth in tourism far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of promoting tourism prove the significance of underdeveloped countries, but also pinpoint eco-friendly tourism implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85338345865 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43182020265 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665413533835 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.246306843 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.75 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166960693284 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495737474523 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436013271115 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884942101581 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310760635227 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.26 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.