In less developed countries, tourism has developed significantly in the last decade, discuss the disadvantages and advantages
There is no denying that in last decade in underdeveloped countries the tourism has developed significantly. As the tourism flourished in the less developed countries it has both advantages and disadvantages. From my perspective, I am inclined to ponder that the tourism industry not only beneficial for the less developed countries but also have enormous cultural and national benefits.
At the outset, myriad conspicuous reasons can be brought up to elaborate that tourism has a lot more beneficial implications for underdeveloped countries. The preponderant explanation lies in the fact that as the tourism will thrive it will attract the thousands of visitors around the globe which will aid the country to earn foreign reserves. Moreover, the tourism industry will bring the career opportunities and also build the infrastructure of the country. Hence tourism will benefit the country in various ways.
On the other hand, Opponents argue that tourism industry is the basic cause to damage the native culture. As the number of traveller increase, it will halt the traditions resulting that people tend to change their culture under foreign influence. So the tourism will have the potential to destroy the native norms on a permanent basis and there is a possibility to lose the culture.
Precisely analysing the facts, I would like to recapitulate that the tourism merits outweigh it's few limitations which can be addressed strategically.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 463, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...uild the infrastructure of the country. Hence tourism will benefit the country in var...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s which can be addressed strategically.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 227.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37004405286 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09838542428 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577092511013 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6518126687 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.818181818 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 7.25397266985 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216534273896 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940693586044 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982718723619 0.071462118173 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121080748441 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119326457548 0.0609392437508 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.