Long distance communication is helpful for both doctors and the patients. Give your opinions about this statement.
Technology has a positive and negative impact on our lifestyle. Using technology, people can think to communicate with everyone either it is friend, family or doctor. These days, there is ongoing debate that long-distance communication is helpful for both doctors and the patients. In this essay, I will provide my point of view by analyzing both sides of the argument.
In remote rural areas, hospital and the good physician does not exist. It is beneficial for patients to take guidance from its physician by other mediums like phone of internet. For instance, there are lot websites on all type of physician are available and an appointment can be taken accordingly. These physicians can have video call and patient can feel the doctor in front of him, which looks like natural and normal communication. Therefore, in the light of this success story we can say physician and patient could have long distance, the technology resolve the issue of long distance.
On the other hand, people who think patient and doctor relationship is difficult to handle remotely have different views. Sometimes, it is difficult for patients to describe the symptoms on cell phone; misunderstanding on both sides could be occurred. For example, a survey done in early 21st century revealed that doctors who take treatment over phone have less chances of diagnosis of actual disease. Hence, the repercussion of misunderstanding could have adverse effect on patient's life.
To recapitulate remote communication between doctor and patients are helpful. The essay discussed the main advantage of remote checkup, how it can be effective for patients and deleterious and detrimental effects of long distance communication with patients.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun chances is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...tors who take treatment over phone have less chances of diagnosis of actual disease....
^^^^
Line 5, column 477, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'patients'' or 'patient's'?
Suggestion: patients'; patient's
...erstanding could have adverse effect on patients life. To recapitulate remote communi...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, hence, if, look, so, therefore, for example, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33823529412 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99292707174 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3395870241 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1333333333 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23950113554 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857924644077 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107405915652 0.071462118173 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168414645567 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0978420041132 0.0609392437508 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.