The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’t waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement
Whether libraries should not provide their users with expensive media such as videos and software and so forth or not is a matter of controversy among many. some people are of the belief that it is the waste of limited source of libraries to buy such stuff. However, I strongly disagree with the notion put forward since I think we should welcome the changes which stem from modern lifestyle.
It would appear that libraries have a limited budget to buy materials and books. Hence, It is necessary that they only buy books as the primary object of a foundation of libraries is to encourage people to read books. Therefore, expensive hi-tech media such as DVDs should not be supplied by libraries. The reason is that they are expensive in terms of both the materials itself and the gadgets by which they can be used.
However, it does not necessarily follow that the expensiveness of these materials should impede purchasing of them. In fact, It goes without saying that the technology grows rapidly in all aspects of human life. In the same way, these days the usage of the digital version of books are more common these days. Thus, if a human being does not cope pace with this fast-changing world then we will be left behind the benefits that they offer. Moreover, although one could say that they are expensive but a lot of books in the format of PDF can be stored in DVDs or flashes so they still are in a cost-benefit situation.
To conclude, I strongly disagree with the idea that libraries should not provide their users with high-tech media such as DVDs. As a matter of fact, they should encourage people to make use of them more as it is the gifts of modern lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... is a matter of controversy among many. some people are of the belief that it is the...
^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...courage people to make use of them more as it is the gifts of modern lifestyle.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, i think, in fact, such as, as a matter of fact, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 20.9802955665 172% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64882943144 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46828633768 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501672240803 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5420084764 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.923076923 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271589075027 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0933744863469 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717897970655 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176158555345 0.151781067708 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518076565442 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.5310837438 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.