nurturing environment
Recently, the phenomenon of the nurturing environment and its corresponding impact on person's accomplishments has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the calm place is highly beneficial, such issue might be regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that psychological impacts can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the psychological standpoint, the conditions of a place where people grow up in it can provide them with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that the serenity and the neat places are intertwined inextricably with not only low distraction but also a better learing. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the mental ability. Thus,beneficial ramifications of both a quiet place and a relaxed mind apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of educational science, an aggresive nurturing atmosphere might increase the consequences of low self-confidence. Moreover, fundamental aspects of focusing on lessons would relate to this reality that the demerits of the potential skills pertain to learning methods. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a strict timetable is correlated negatively with less accomplishments. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the educational perspective.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of growing up in quiet place far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of higher numebr of accomplishments prove the significance of the learning styles, but also pinpoint its psychological implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , beneficial
...hich discovered the mental ability. Thus,beneficial ramifications of both a quiet place and...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 452, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun accomplishments is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...timetable is correlated negatively with less accomplishments. Hence, it is correct t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1571.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63082437276 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51116935984 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620071684588 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3927007653 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.916666667 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.91666666667 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0910941145198 0.242375264174 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346212794668 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086676623082 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.050786117482 0.151781067708 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599991725422 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.67 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.