The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn’t waste their limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and DVDs. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
A school of thought, however, contends that libraries should focus on increasing the collection of the books because the library is meant and renowned to collect the books. This notion, in my opinion, is contentious as technology already changed the meaning to keep, viewing anything extensively. I will ponder on the positive side of the topic with required arguments and examples.
There are myriads of arguments that why libraries should not just focus on physicals books. The preponderant one is that we are living in the technology era where a plethora of ways is available to access the information. Consequently, people do not have time to sit on the couch and read the physical books. For an instance, people love to read books while traveling and it is not possible for everyone to keep carry a different kind of books with them all the time. As a result, if libraries can help them to provide e-books, so the reader would get more choices to access the information whether on a smartphone, laptop or any preferable mean of technology while keeping copyrights and legal constraint in mind.
Another pivotal aspect to support my point is that CD, DVD or computer software can provide a better user experience if anyone tries to explore the information. For example, we humans have a tendency to allure towards different kind of things at a single point in time. However, if digital media helps to attract users with never-ending experience, user feel more touched with the technology which enhances the interest of the users.
In conclusion, as per above-mentioned points and elucidation, one can conclude that with the expansion of technology, the library should update with the latest CD and videos so that it allures the upcoming generation to learn new things in the more systematic way.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00996677741 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84991746515 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.084943018 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117109793583 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387187571605 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0225162262782 0.071462118173 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0693956866541 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00202470757384 0.0609392437508 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.