Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Essay topics:

Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Recently, the phenomenon of involving employees in decision making and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of asking workers opinion is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both destructive and negative by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that employee’s thoughts in working environment can be a plus due to company progress, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, caring about workers ideas can provide the work office with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that friendly environment, as well as less stress among workers, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered productivity can increase by involving worker to decide on crucial matters. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both productivity and career progression apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of a psychology, poor management might increase the consequences of failing corporation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of bankrupt company relate to this reality that the demerits of a sustainable management pertain to losing employee’s loyalty. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that employee’s anxiety is correlated negatively with involving them in important issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of effective management.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of asking employee’s ideas far outweigh its drawbacks, and it does not only improve the company progress but also pinpoint employee’s loyalty implications.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 179, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...ested by many that the matter of asking workers opinion is highly beneficial, such issu...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87686567164 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42333817549 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664179104478 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3618354421 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.181818182 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160811869946 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549929337715 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466224753911 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0928520278211 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368458320406 0.0609392437508 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.95 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.