Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of tourism industry in developing countries and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the tourism sector is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both destructive and negative by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the tourism industry in less developed countries can be a plus due to improve economy and provide job opportunities, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, attracting tourists can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that developing economy, as well as increasing in local job opportunities, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered job market can develop by increasing the number of tourists in developing nations. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the tourism industry and financial improvements apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a psychology, higher number of foreigners might increase the consequences of culture shock. Moreover, fundamental aspects of damaging environment can relate to this reality that the demerits of destroying historical buildings pertain to the tourism. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of ruining local culture is correlated negatively with high number of tourists with different culture. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of cultural exchange.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the tourism industry far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of attracting foreigners prove the significance of developing economy, but also pinpoint job opportunities implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74048442907 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28021841596 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598615916955 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6468935294 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.25 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0833333333 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129649606778 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475478028693 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435939388557 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799103946922 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503976294998 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.