Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this change.
Recently the phenomenon of mass communication and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of communication means is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both positive and constructive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that communication tools can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, methods of mass media can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that convenient lifestyles, as well as internet, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted an academic research which discovered social interaction. Thus, beneficial ramification of both social behavior and internet browsing can be seen.
Within the realm of economic, social media might increase the consequences of depression. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of aggressive behavior relate to this reality that the demerits of using mobile pertain to extreme anxiety. As a tangible example, a scientific experiment undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of social media correlated negatively with computer. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of negative attitude.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of internet usage far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of mobile prove the significance of revolutionized technology, but also pinpoint information technology implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87083333333 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32759662603 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8820309023 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1117388565 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0370114390682 0.0925447433944 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359404402692 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608332306251 0.151781067708 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563476935765 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.14 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.