Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of learning music in schools and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of teaching by music is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that improving education quality by interfacing music can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, promoting education quality by playing music can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that playing an instrument, as well as improving creativity are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered motivation can be increased by music. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both playing music and increasing productivity can be seen.
Within the realm of different subjects in school, traditional education might increase the consequences of depression. Moreover, fundamental aspects of rising anxiety level relate to this reality that the demerits of studying music pertain to family background. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of teaching music in pre-schools is correlated negatively with aggressive behavior. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of teaching music.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of teaching music instrument far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of music prove the significance of education quality, but also pinpoint productivity of students implications
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 489, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd increasing productivity can be seen. Within the realm of different subjects i...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72556390977 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24780917822 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624060150376 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9841793177 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148913204681 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553426031345 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.029019479928 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876344352283 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0208446800601 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.