Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some negative effects on individual lives as well on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nino A, [۲۱.۰۳.۱۸ ۱۲:۲۷]
Recently, the phenomenon of revolutionized information and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of mass media is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded negative by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that mass communication can have both positive and negative effects, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, new methods of communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that development in social interaction, as well as internet usage, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered people who use social media are more content. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both positive social behavior and using mobile phones apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of information technology, using too much internet might increase the consequences of aggressive behavior. Moreover, fundamental aspects of anxiety can relate to this reality that the demerits of depression among young people pertain to increasing the mobile phone usage. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using mass media such as internet, TV, social media is correlated negatively with obesity. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of violent content in TV programs.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of innovation mass communication far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of various social communication means prove the significance of information revolution in our lives, but also pinpoint positive implications on people’s interaction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74736842105 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31294596352 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645614035088 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.059427657 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.5 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141235222174 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468762453731 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397586062435 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0694535918169 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044527276886 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.