Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In this day and age, involving workers in decision making policy has become a debatable issue among people from all walks of life all around the world. Although participating in decision making is regarded as thoroughly both positive and constructive by many individuals, there are a number of people hold an opposite view. I am inclined to strongly believe that making a decision with the help of employees is quite beneficial as it could increase productivity of companies.
To begin with, there are a number of reasons why I support employers should involve employees in making decision. First and foremost is that it will enhance the productivity of the company. Secondly, it is occasionally argued that maximising profits is attributed to the fact that workers feel more responsibility. From my personal experience, when I was working in a factory, I took part in a meeting. Consequently, it is quite clear that workers can aid employers to progress.
However, there is no doubt that involving employees in making imperative decisions can provide companies with various negative outcomes. Despite this possibility, it is highly claimed that a decrease in productivity is related to the fact that some employees have less experience. By way of example, a recent academic research conducted by Oxford university researchers in 2012 has shown that losing profits is negatively correlated to bad decisions. Thus, it is quite obvious that workers can lead to losing profits.
To put it in a nutshell, while there are several persuasive arguments on both sides, I am of the opinion that the merits of participating workers in meetings far outweigh its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1398.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1970260223 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07252612668 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576208178439 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7150109261 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.538461538 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18643040268 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584821257089 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558418346065 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944964608218 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646901675853 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.