Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, the involving of workers in decision making has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question "is it advantageous?" Although some people disagree with this issue, I agree with involving employees in making decisions.
From a psychological point of view, involving highly-skilled workers is indeed bound up tightly with profit-orientated companies, which it might lead to both productivity and productive workers. For example, a group of profound psychologists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to establish the relationship between individual needs and spiritual needs as well as constructive suggestions. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that clever employees are correlated positively with not only maximising profits but also making progression.
In economic terms, the involving smart employees in decision making is undoubtedly attributable to structural changes, in that it would lead to policy changes, organizational changes, and economic development. A well-known example of such attributions is entrepreneurs, which is cause for concern since they had been mistaken to take innovations for granted. Had they provided policy reforms in advance, they might have had the opportunity to cut risks. Thus, working-class employees could play an imperative role in successful enterprises.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree with engaging workers in decision making. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...f workers in decision making has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97933884298 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49881916326 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657024793388 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.858384192 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.7 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178861010139 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612810742247 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503539959837 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107260136785 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0486562874139 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 12.6369458128 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.