There are number of nations, which become on under poverty level. Because in these countries the population increased dramatically and proportion of oldish ages are growing. In now days the technological revolution is evident of live life long. Because they provide a better medication for any ailment. It has great influences on society. I agree with the former view.
There are number of people who believe that, oldies are important since they have an extensive experience of various social systems. It is evident that, elderly people have a better knowledge of surviving. Apart from that, the blessings of older people are very important for younger ones. Because, they can learn good, and achieve better in their life with the help of inspiration of older people. Moreover, the elderly people know more about culture, traditions, rituals and they provide this information to their children. Which is very important to balancing in cultural identity
There are opposing group of people, who argue that older people are making problems for country. They claim that, there are number of oldies who put pressure on financial resources of the state. For instance many people have retired from services, and the government pays them as pension funds, without any economic contribution. Convincingly, the older people have their own opinions and they have more opportunities of job. Because they can easily handle the situation. Whereas, in now days the company gives less chance to young people and they think that oldies are not beneficial for them.
Conclusively, there are number of answers for this question. In my opinion, the presence of older people are blessings of nations. And government needs to provide best services to them
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 83, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on under poverty level. Because in these countries the population increased drama...
^^
Line 2, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortant to balancing in cultural identity There are opposing group of people, who ...
^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nd they have more opportunities of job. Because they can easily handle the situation. W...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, whereas, apart from, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23297491039 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63184475246 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548387096774 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 12.6551724138 158% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1519558489 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.0 104.977214359 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.95 20.9669160288 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170866628127 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0501767748685 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542187282951 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101062354507 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511664334481 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.46 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.94827586207 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.