Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home.
As a result, employees will have much more flexible working hours in the future. Is this a positive or negative development?
It is true fact to consider that various benefits are given by employers to their employees, nowadays. The major benefit is allowing them to work from home instead to perform duties from office. In my opinion, it is more prolific for the employees working from home. This essay will discuss how employees gain benefit.
The first and foremost positive point is that employees save their traveling time and money when they perform their official duties from home as too much time and amount is spent by them in traveling from home to office. Firstly, if they save their traveling time, they can be more productive, and they can also provide enormous benefits to their employers. Secondly, if they will not travel daily, they can save their traveling expense also. For example, a recent survey report reveals that so many employees work from their home in USA, and they all reported that they has saved not only saved huge amount of money but also produced more units of products than past years.
In addition to this, it is also believed that employees stay in harmony with their family members when they work from home. They can share their love and affection with their children, thereby; they can enjoy their life without any stress. For instance, A UN report of 2018 clearly shows that employees who work from home are more happy and prosperous in their life than those who go daily to office.
In the end, it is concluded that employees who work from home get umpteen benefits while working from home. Therefore, I firmly agree that it is a lucrative development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
..., they can save their traveling expense also. For example, a recent survey report re...
^^^^
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'have'
Suggestion: have
...in USA, and they all reported that they has saved not only saved huge amount of mon...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 43.0 20.9802955665 205% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1308.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82656826568 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26579684076 2.71678728327 83% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516605166052 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6936301358 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.615384615 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.25397266985 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328259650795 0.242375264174 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146004735784 0.0925447433944 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902275001395 0.071462118173 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240651263121 0.151781067708 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042950445287 0.0609392437508 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.