Many institutes and universities practice written examination and not computer-based tests for their students. Your opinion on that.
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue, on practicing a written examination instead of computer-based by several universities, can lead to thought-provoking discussions. Irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either side, my opinion is that computer-based tests are much more practical for the students and their future career life.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, written examinations are an old fashion technique, and it does not help student to catch up with the world development. It is important to note that the multinational companies use cutting-edge technologies, and their employees should be aware about the computer programs. Therefore, the aforementioned argument shows that the written examinations do not benefit students as much the computer-based does.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that there are some students have problems in their free-hand writing skills, and they may get less score marks in their examination as a result. First and foremost, practicing the tests on the computer reliefs students from the writing problems which effect on students final marks. This exemplifies that students will have a fair marking by their professors.
To sum up, there is equally evidence to support the arguments I have provided, and hence, my opinion is that if universities continued in their written examination, students may face further problems to deal with computers which are commonly used in several companies.
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person`s age. in the workplace, there are most offen decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against olde 77
- Many institutes and universities practice written examination and not computer-based tests for their students. Your opinion on that. 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need addition funding, but other think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you must agree 80
- Some people believe that TV is a useful invention. To what extent you agree with the statement. Give your opinion and explain with the observations and examples from your personal experience. 77
- The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, so, therefore, as a result, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1329.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51452282158 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24897060459 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597510373444 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.4128191961 50.4703680194 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.9 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287822101088 0.242375264174 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108812183414 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691115687203 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176895702946 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652987417594 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.