Marketing strategy for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this can impact on their reputation.
Nowadays, marketing strategy has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question "should it be placed on discounts?" Although marketing is regarded as thoroughly both positive and constructive by many individuals, I tend to believe that brans are of high importance.
From a social point of view, marketing strategy in indeed bound up tightly with big brands, which it might lead to both alluring customers and long-term financial benefits. For example, a group of reputable social scientists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to establish the relationship between enticing consumers to purchase products and reasonable prices as well as offering discounts. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that luxury goods are correlated positively with not only short-term promotions but also satisfied consumers.
In economic terms, marketing strategy is undoubtedly attributable to maximizing profits, in that it would lead to vastly diminished economic production, offering discounts, and the quality of commodities. A well-known example of such attributions is expensive cars, which are cause for concern since they had been mistaken to take buyers for granted. Had they provided companies with comparative advantage, they migh have had the opportunity to sell more cars. Thus, their reputation could play an imperative role in making profits.
To recapitulate, I firmly believe that reputation is of high importance. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...Nowadays, marketing strategy has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...als, I tend to believe that brans are of high importance. From a social point of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76377952756 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2293257589 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692913385827 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.3684947442 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.4 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205072007689 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0599162955867 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414812960348 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0986373041472 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043447841589 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.