International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem?
Nowadays, tourism has become a lon-running dispute among the public all around the world, which leads to a moot question " does it make people prejudiced?" Although some people think it is wrong, I tend to believe that it makes humans biased and there are some perfect solutions.
From a religious point of view, tourists are indeed bound up tightly with cultural changes, which they might lead to both threat to the local culture and religions. For example, a group of reputable psychologists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to establish the relatioship between temples and cultural background as well as prayers. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that perfect solutions are correlated positively with making them familiar to religions.
In social terms, tourism is undoubtedly attributable to social changes, in that it would lead to both social backgrounds and family backgrounds. Awell-known example of such attributions is narrow-minded persons, which are cause for concern since they had been mistaken to take host countries for granted. Had they provided tourists with comfort in advance, they might have had the opportunity to improve socio-economic conditions. Thus, prejudiced visitors could play an imperative role in respecting to local culture.
To recapitulate, I agree that tourism could make people biased. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61506276151 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11952677158 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65690376569 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1612204066 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.2 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940766294075 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0381199218988 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466816158747 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0586437152691 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320312530728 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.