Mass media like TV, newspaper, and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?
Recently, mass media has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what are the positive and negative consequences?” Whereas it is a widely held view that mass media is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the technical standpoint, TV and newspapers are bound up inextricably with commercials, which indicates they lead to both radio advertising and state-of-the-art technologies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between information sharing and digital revolution as well as an exponential increase in communication channels. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of breaking news is correlated positively with not only television but also radio.
Within the realm of information science, without the slightest doubt, periodicals attribute to media bias, in that it would come down to target groups, identity theft, and radio stations. A salient example of such attribution is broadband internet access, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take telecommunications for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint global problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to articles, columnists, and even editorials. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of print media.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of mass media are of more significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80363636364 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44261288429 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694545454545 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1900332444 50.4703680194 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104311715832 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0318159328833 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362947234255 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0596067129439 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222265140783 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 9.94827586207 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.