The means of communication have changed a lot in people’s daily life. What are the positive and negative impact of this?
The controversial topic with respect to communication never fails to attract public attention. There has been a heated debate on whether changes that communication has changed people's life a lot or not. As far as I am concerned, I inclined to believe that this technology has both positive and negative.
On one hand, a variety of convenience can be attributed to the development of communication. Among them, face time call is a convincing example, relatives are able to keep in touch with each other wherever they are. Due to the globalization, the distance between people are becoming smaller and smaller. Additionally, clients could even talk their business on the flight, which can not be imagined in the past. To be short, the innovation of communication has made people's life more effective and interesting.
On the other hand, there are also few numbers of negative consequences that the drastic development of communication has made. The exposure of private life is becoming prevalent. Social media, for instance, has caused severe problems in teaching young generations. Some lavish life records those rich people in developed countries post on it may lead to misunderstand of the meaning of the life. It is to say, youngsters no longer learn to struggle and being industrious, they follow their role models and spending money from their parents which could be very wasteful. As a result, communication could somehow cause hazards and chaos in society.
In conclusion, due to the foregoing point of view, although communication contributes to the high quality of current life, it is still detrimental in some aspects. I highly recommend that the government should introduce statutes and laws in order to make this technology develop in correct direction.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24647887324 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08115291298 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62676056338 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.497694585 50.4703680194 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.125 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.75 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231346038688 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683627845417 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760714954746 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135553643364 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769894856605 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.