Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. Discuss it.
There is no denying that due to a drastic change in medical science, the life expectancy of people keeps on increasing. Some people are considering this as the greatest achievement of society while some people do not consider this as a positive development. In this essay, I am going to provide you necessary evidence before reaching conclusion.
As the previous data suggest that average age of death has been increased from 46.7 in 1990 to 59.3 in 2016. Though the trend is encouraging as now our near and dear ones live longer. The data shows that humans are making right health-related decisions and this achievement can be attributed to improvement in public health and medical care. With the improvement in life expectancy, now old people are living more and more so due to that there is an increase in financial burden on families like regular health checkups and daily observation at the medical center. It’s good that one can stay for long years with his or her family and enjoy happy moments but financial burden can cause conflict within the family.
In addition, living long life means a less working force for the country in terms of less prosperity and growth. We are living in a country where resources are very less and non-renewable. Further, it causes in increasing the population of the world. The population creates so many problems like poverty in people, the lake of basic facilities and so many other problems. So instead of advantages, it becomes a great disadvantage for future life.
To sum with the above, one can conclude that an increase in average life expectancy rate can put the burden on environment and society but it can be dealt jointly by individuals and society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ry evidence before reaching conclusion. As the previous data suggest that average ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for future life. To sum with the above, one can conclude that an increase in ave...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75448180892 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6859287049 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.21428571429 7.25397266985 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138279642839 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419481059001 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459409452821 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695504509197 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348525130819 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.