Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
It is irrefutable to say that, over the years medical technology has evolved and benefited human to live longer and a healthy life. There is still debatable discussion going on that whether the medical technology is responsible for a increased life expectancy or not. this essay will succinctly discuss technology in medical field and its impact on human life.
Firstly, everyone wish to live longer and a healthy life. medical technology is helping people in this regard because nowadays most of the disease are cureable and advance technology is being used in differenct medical processes. For example, open heart surgery is no more required to treat a patient of heart attack stroke. advancement in medical has helped people to live longer.
Furthermore, using the latest technology, the disease can be identified in advance and timely treatment helps to get rid of those diseases. Proper treatment and new technology advancement has increased the average life span of a person. A research survy, for instance, declared that average life of a person has increased from 55 years to 65 years. technology has major contribution in saving people life.
To recapitulate the foregoing discussion, human life expectancy has increased during the last few decades and the major reason behind that, is the advancement in medical technology field. In my opinion, technology is the major reason for human life expectancy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-27 | ahmedmemon_93 | 72 | view |
- Urban sprawl is an increasing issue around the world. One way in which to solve this issue is to construct cities vertically rather than horizontally. Are such cities a good idea? 80
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree? 55
- Urban sprawl is an increasing issue around the world. One way in which to solve this issue is to construct cities vertically rather than horizontally. Are such cities a good idea? 80
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 82
- People emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e medical technology is responsible for a increased life expectancy or not. this ...
^
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...for a increased life expectancy or not. this essay will succinctly discuss technolog...
^^^^
Line 2, column 59, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Medical
...wish to live longer and a healthy life. medical technology is helping people in this re...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 326, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Advancement
...treat a patient of heart attack stroke. advancement in medical has helped people to live lo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Technology
...as increased from 55 years to 65 years. technology has major contribution in saving people...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, still, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26548672566 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84488155899 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535398230088 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4499056037 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5384615385 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296793066045 0.242375264174 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122569118789 0.0925447433944 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787278769471 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198418608323 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760488704071 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.