Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is 100 per cent true that due to advanced medical technology human's life expectancy increased by at least 15 to 20 years. Earlier even due to a simple cold and cough, some people were losing their life. But now with advanced medical technology doctors are able to cure all type of diseases. I completely agree that the human's life expectancy increased due to advanced medical technology. Throughout this essay, I will discuss it in detail.

To begin with, the first and foremost reason for this is that every day new inventions are happening in medical science to provide better treatment to patients. Nowadays, we have new machines to diagnose a disease at a very early stage like CT scan, MRI to diagnose any brain-related disease. New vaccinations are also invented to protect against different viruses. For example, we have a polio vaccine to protect physical disability disease.

In addition, now we have hospitals with better equipment and super-specialist doctors to provide high-quality treatments. Also, we have computer base robotic surgery to perform a complex operation. Laser-based surgery with high accuracy is also very popular, especially for plastic surgery.

Overall, as discussed in the above paragraphs we can say due to the advanced medical technology average human's life expectancy has been increased significantly.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...f diseases. I completely agree that the humans life expectancy increased due to advanc...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...the advanced medical technology average humans life expectancy has been increased sign...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, at least, for example, in addition, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33802816901 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96861406112 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629107981221 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 373.5 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.0092330637 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.4615384615 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3846153846 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.25397266985 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164987950872 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0602810269385 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661521506369 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100822511838 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695512897018 0.0609392437508 114% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 53.1260098522 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.