More information available online, so library books are useless. Agree or disagree with this statement.

Essay topics:

More information available online, so library books are useless. Agree or disagree with this statement.

In this tech-savvy era, people are interested in reading electronic books rather than printed books. Nowadays from shopping to books everything is online, digital and newer technology. Many people believe that online reading is comfortable where others oppose with different opinion. In my view, it is two-edged sword lets discuss the plausible outcomes of both cases.

On the positive side, there are prolific advantages in online reading. It provides more flexibility and higher opinions. Other view, online books are less costly when compared to the printed books. Moreover, it is environmental-friendly because a lot of paper trees are saved. In addition, accessibility reduces the boredom of visiting and purchasing books.

On the other side, each coin has the both side view similarly, continuous reading online by the computers and electronic gadgets are unhealthy for juveniles. Probing further, all books are not available online. For example, some specialized books are available only in printed book. Furthermore, users can lose the favourite books which saved in there computer or mobile phones due to virus.

While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, it can be said that, reading books online is considered as highly rewarded experience for the society if and only if the precautions are taken at every step.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'book'.
Suggestion: book
...rinted books. Nowadays from shopping to books everything is online, digital and newer...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, similarly, so, while, for example, in addition, in my view

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 31.9359605911 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 211.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4028436019 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88410335376 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649289099526 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.4545975972 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4285714286 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0714285714 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147524190427 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552488666102 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614124328742 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818780446975 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457898219839 0.0609392437508 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 53.1260098522 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.