more information available online so library books are useless. Agree or disagree
Recently, the phenomenon of online information and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of information technologies is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the latest information can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the useless library can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the university library, as well as the international library, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the library data. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the traditional knowledge and general information apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the library information might increase the consequences of the online library. Moreover, fundamental aspects of new sources of information could relate to this reality that the demerits of the false information pertain to the lack of information. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the information data is correlated negatively with the news information. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of new science.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of library references far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the limited information prove the significance of lack of the facilities, but also pinpoint old fashion books implication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61278195489 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31360856107 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612781954887 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9341338949 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.416666667 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195563886628 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656727979735 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439637734602 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106357893631 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0174396894363 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.