"More information available online so library's book are useless" or As e-books are available online these days, the value of printed books has diminished. Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of e-books and its corresponding impact has sparked an ambivalent debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the paperless study is not highly beneficial, such issue is elicited thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am sanguinely inclined to believe that online information can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, online libraries can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of distance learning, as well as educational websites and technological tools, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more enthusiasm amongst students. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both burgeoning methods of teaching and a wide variety of tastes apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, printed books might increase the consequences of the less expenditure of commuting. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of cutting of the trees could relate to this reality that the demerits of environmental preservation pertain to air pollution. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the ease of access is correlated negatively with the convenient exploitation of online resources. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of eliminating paper materials.
To conclude, while there are myriads of compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of e-books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of virtual libraries prove the significance of pervasive passion of students to printed sources, but also pinpoint the implications of ameliorating the situation of study.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61754385965 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28801324305 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652631578947 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9156521632 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.416666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133413614602 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413358704313 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.040081284081 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0729935693102 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224702921482 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.