In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
There are a great number of people who interpret the formal assessments as thoroughly positive, while others hold an opponent’s view. I am inclined to believe that continual assessments are more suitable than formal examinations.
First of all, it is argued that continual assignments play a pivotal role in creating adroit people. This may be attributed to the fact that such assessments could relieve the stress of a student during an exam, therefore, they could create a feeling of accomplishment and competence, which would certainly amplify a student’s enthusiasm, determination and etiquette towards many daunting tasks. Take the math for example, even high intelligent pupils have to do uphill struggle to pass the exam, when they are puzzled.
In addition, it is claimed that formal examinations are not flexible enough to assess the other trait that possessed by a student such as leadership, interpersonal and social skills, and the ability to present a topic to the public . These traits could be acquired through practical assignments such as presentations and projects, which would instill strong feeling of self-esteem in student so that they are more likely to perform up to expectations in society. Specifically, a research study conducted by Yale university in 2015 has found that regular assignments could enhance a person’s intellectual ability to make decisions related to social and personal life.
In conclusion, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that continual assignments enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of student’s evaluation and increases the pupil’s confidence. It is expected that take cognizance of these facts and begin to adopt this way of assessment.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ability to present a topic to the public . These traits could be acquired through ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60836501901 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30615426012 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7248108155 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.5 104.977214359 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8 7.25397266985 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0880965111958 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343377417558 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293907324562 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0531576416469 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202274315891 0.0609392437508 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 12.6369458128 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.