In this era of globalization, boundaries – political, geographical, cultural – are being
removed as peoples blend and persons share, with each other, the very values that once
segregated them. Cultural mixing has begun tearing down all the ethnical and racial
pigeonholes and move us closer, by the day, towards one universal race of humans. Like
all else, even this has its occasional downsides, which, when put in comparison with the
upsides, are negligible.
Firstly, we have to consider that cultural mixing is perhaps the only non-coercive way
to move global humanity towards ideal equality, a belief sought for by all the great
persons, and political and religious ideologies. While many have struggled throughout
human history to uproot tyranny, oppression, bigotry and segregation, their paths have
been tainted by the blood of the bold and tears of the beautiful. True that we, through
our ravaging revolutions, have progressed, but at a cost that undoubtedly has been dear.
Cultural mixing, on the other hand, is the benedictory prophet, who ushers the great
communion of all men in empathy, leaving behind all ethos, and he comes only in peace.
Yet, some conservatives argue that free-mixing of cultural values degrade people’s
sense of morality. They must be conveniently forgetful of all the immoralities, in the
name of conservation, that evidently have tarnished human history. Although, it is
undeniable that cultural mixing, like any other progressive enterprise, has coincided with
social unpleasantries, for example declining stability among families in the third world
countries, the blame has not yet been rationally put. And, of course, there are many other
socio-economic controllers such as wage-earning, and individualism that may very well
be responsible for today’s social ills.
In sum, we must not be closed-minded to the global brethren cultures, because, only by
doing this we may, one day, realize the ever-cherished dreamland of universal humanity,
where “… all the people, sharing the world in peace” will not be only a thing of
imagination.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, so, third, well, while, for example, of course, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1823.0 1207.87684729 151% => OK
No of words: 327.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5749235474 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12813095406 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 139.433497537 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626911314985 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 379.143842365 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 3.65517241379 301% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7325553087 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.916666667 104.977214359 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 25.0 4.12807881773 606% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122281565592 0.242375264174 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464966592783 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429044291644 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0327435825226 0.151781067708 22% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463248947406 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.0 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.