Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss.
Recently, the phenomenon of striking a balance between work and life and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although challenged by many that the matter of a diligent worker is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that minimum personal time availability can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, spending excessive time at work can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of becoming a workaholic person, as well as the shortage of family time, are inevitably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the relationship between being a fantastic worker and a great family person. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both having a healthy lifestyle and avoiding overtime working hours apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, having time for personal life might increase the consequences of a healthy personality. Moreover, fundamental aspects of a supportive person could relate to this reality that the demerits of a damaged personality pertain to an unhealthy lifestyle. As a tangible example, some scientific university has asserted that the downside of work-related issues is correlated negatively with a hard working person. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of working member of a big family.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides I profoundly believe that the benefits of keeping a balanced lifestyle far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of spending time at home prove the significance of having a great personality, but also pinpoint improving personal interest implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40878378378 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14882082524 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628378378378 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4233786438 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.416666667 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272255292921 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904542212558 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751285974931 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152929577894 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463339061949 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.