The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree?
Recently, effective ways to reducing unemployment has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what steps can be taken to deal with unemployment?". Whereas it is a widely held view that urbanization introduction is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economy standpoint, employments are bound up inextricably with full time workers, which indicates they lead to both payment and work's hour. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between professional staff and academic certificate as well as an exponential increase in employment rate. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of annual salary is correlated positively with not only skilled labor but also city residents.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, corporate company attribute to strong leadership, in that it would come down to decision making, management, and job opportunities. A salient example of such attribution is rural area, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take shortage of talented people for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint economic problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to bank loan, investment, and even more facilities. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role government to provide fiscal opportunity for private sectors.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that more measurements and studies must be into taken to solve this issue. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the economy standpoint, employments...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: fulltime
...loyments are bound up inextricably with full time workers, which indicates they lead to b...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...led labor but also city residents. Within the realm of society, without the...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l opportunity for private sectors. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7602739726 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23588639798 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 139.433497537 151% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.719178082192 0.580463131201 124% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.574384725 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.384615385 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102107152808 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276643756668 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547829915484 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0600065975782 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057817043036 0.0609392437508 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.