The only way to reduce air pollution is to increase the prices of fuels for vehicles. What is your opinion and explain with your own experiences and examples.
Nowadays, whether the only way to cut air pollution is to increase the prices of fuels for vehicles has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. Some people believe that a higher fuel price will hinder the use of vehicles and further cut pollutant, others hold the opposite views. From my perspective, I tend to agree with the latter one. To better articulate, following paragraphs will elaborate reasoning.
First and foremost, there are many reasons why price control on fuel is not the only way to address the problem of air pollution, but the most conspicuous one lies the fact that people do not consider the higher petrol price as an obstacle for driving. Taking an example from me, I am a property manager and vehicle independent. I need to inspect properties and have meeting with clients regularly, which means other means of transports is time-consuming.
Moreover, another way to prevent air pollution that should be considered is the role of governments. As long as people concern, the fundamental source of air pollution come from discharge of carbon dioxide from manufacturing industries. Hence, governments should assume their responsibility to impose tax on the discharge of greenhouse gases. A recent article published by the Economist shows that the imposition of tax on soot by Chinese governments has effectively controlled the emission of greenhouse gases.
In conclusion, I reckon that increase of fuels price is not the only way to reduce air pollution. To tackle this issue, governments and societies need to make a concerted effort to find solutions.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, moreover, so, i reckon, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00375504639 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596153846154 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9262141725 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.30769230769 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235613183278 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798723754823 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102965798656 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146077006034 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513082767494 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.