In our education system assessments are done through formal written examination. Do you think it is still valid?
Recently, the phenomenon of completing the assessment through formal written examination has sparked a heated debate. Some might argue that written examinations are best way to test an individual’s performance, whereas others believe that practical examinations provide better results. This essay will discuss why written assessments are still valid and should be used in future as well.
From education system's point of view, the decisive role of written exams in humans are still important as they judge on the basis of solving questions in a stipulated time which allows one to demonstrate his/her learning skills. We have come so far by employing this method of learning and it's not short of any miracle that we have achieved so much success in this short amount of time. For instance, written examinations are a standard through which people can be judged without any biased. Therefore, theoretical exams are still valid.
In spite of the success of written exams, some people still believe that now it's time to move to practical exams. Every human is not the same and learning curve for every individual is going to be different because of this we should have an alternate approach to find one's capability. For example, people who are not good in theory often do much better in practical’s which is used in the real world. Hence, practical examinations can be a key to the future.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of written assessments far outweighs its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of these exams prove their significance, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'are the best'.
Suggestion: are the best
...e might argue that written examinations are best way to test an individual's perfor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 156, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to curve'
Suggestion: to curve
...very human is not the same and learning curve for every individual is going to be dif...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ould have an alternate approach to find ones capability. For example, people who are...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21033210332 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91843429803 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590405904059 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8515950406 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.615384615 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193716796407 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727661396066 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624753084148 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113457761364 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537556795505 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.