Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of parents’ responsibilities on children’s behavior and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the poor upbringing is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the child personality can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the direct responsibility can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the family support, as well as the violence by juveniles, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the violent games. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the mass media and the racial minority apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the undertaking responsibility, behavior development might increase the consequences of the social training. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the aggressive behavior relate to this reality that the demerits of the new generation pertain to the street crime. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the turning to crime is correlated negatively with the divorce. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the literacy.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the nurturing of a child far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of personal responsibility prove the significance of the deprivation of proper schooling, but also pinpoint the poverty implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59701492537 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44222434523 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638059701493 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5764032653 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145903029934 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437163882719 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577767928617 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0761452711108 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399704061513 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.