Is tourism in less developed countries advantage or disadvantage? Discuss your views and give your opinion.
Recently, tourism in less developed countries has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question, "Is it advantageous or not?" whereas it is a widely held view that tourism industry is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the economic standpoint, countries developments are bound up inextricably with globalization policies, which indicated they lead to both developing progress and state-of-the-art technologies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between globalization and cultural policies as well as an exponential increase in job achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of occurring source of income is correlated positively with not only irreversible changes but also adverse outcomes.
Within the realm of eco-tourism science, without the slightest doubt, efficient accommodations systems attribute to alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down to governmental interventions, tourist implications, and tourism institutions. A salient example of such attribution is non-governmental organizations, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take cultural improvements for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint cultural problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to mass tourism, niche tourism, and even extreme tourism. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that government must remain accountable for the tourism industry. However, we perceive that with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover. Meanwhile, as a feasible solution, the local authorities are recommended to enforce strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
sible solution, the local authorities are recommended to enforce strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Sible
...are hoped to heighten their intellect. sible solution, the local authorities are rec...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, while, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1207.87684729 164% => OK
No of words: 325.0 242.827586207 134% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08923076923 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47380936139 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 139.433497537 155% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664615384615 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 611.1 379.143842365 161% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.4301651515 50.4703680194 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.357142857 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13614108203 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359881992202 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629504470123 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719350102685 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796831433996 0.0609392437508 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 12.6369458128 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.34 11.5310837438 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.19 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 55.0591133005 240% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 23.5 9.94827586207 236% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.