written examination
Recently, the phenomenon of written examination and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that coursework test is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that continues assessment can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From education official standpoint, deep learning can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that attending in workshops, as well as industrial experiences.
According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered efficient learning. Thus beneficial ramifications of both practical knowledge and profound studying apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of written tests, shallow understanding might increase consequences of studying a night before exam. Moreover, fundamental aspects of coursework related to this reality that the demerits of having pressure of examination pertain to feeling disappointment. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of evaluation is correlated negatively with methods. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of qualifications.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of paper based exams far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of tradition assessment prove the significance of scores, but also pinpoint confidence implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nt which discovered efficient learning. Thus beneficial ramifications of both practi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, of course, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.92016806723 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39911811424 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.701680672269 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2627377439 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141929586843 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470046138686 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966230647706 0.071462118173 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.061887737162 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0759040085956 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.06 11.5310837438 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.48 8.32886699507 138% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.