In most of the education systems students are assessed by written examinations Do you think it is a good idea or not Give your reasons

In contemporary world, the progression of written examinations as an assessing method in education systems and its related effects has sparked a heated debate. While proponents assert that it is an effective and proven method that has developed through several years, the opponents disagree with this disposition. This essay will scrutinize few of the several reasons that disapprove this current system of written examination and demonstrate my disaccord with this system by few good examples.

At the first place, there are myriad of arguments in favor of my stance, in which the most preponderant one is that written examinations only test memory of the subjects rather then their creativity, intelligence and other abilities. Besides, many brilliant minds who actually did not make through this system, have now become the iconic figure of their field. As a tangible illustration, Albert Einstein, a renown scientist who changed the perception of science altogether, actually failed thrice in exams followed by expulsion from the institute. Manifestly, it is quite clear that current set of written examinations do not help in recognizing a person’s true talent and abilities.

On the second place, another pivotal aspect of this argument is that written examinations often use scoring system that compare students with each other. Probing further, this comparison may lead to depression and anxiety for those whose true abilities contradict the main scoring criteria. To cite a practical instance, in year 2015, approximately 1100 students attempted suicide due to peer pressure of high marks in the written assessments. Consequently, it is quite evident that this system of examination is negatively effecting people in a community.

To conclude succinctly, this essay discussed appalling nature of the false paradigm of examination through an array of reasons and examples. Which, in my opinion, should be changed as soon as possible.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...only test memory of the subjects rather then their creativity, intelligence and othe...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, consequently, first, if, may, second, so, then, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51666666667 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99039016406 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0352594367 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.307692308 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225455184465 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738609547279 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635844960853 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121967122114 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046163749073 0.0609392437508 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.