When it comes to speaking a foreign language, a multitude share the thought that the native environment is a must and any adscititious location may never be helpful, in making a speaker fluent and flawless in the second language. I am in total disagreement with this school of thought and in the coming lines, I will explain why this statement had been null and void in the past and how it is untrue in present.
In the past, right from the early ages, people travelled long distances to find a quality life. Interestingly, many of the communities were very concerned about their communication and therefore, could not tolerate any foreign language within their circle. Consequently, people trying to make through their lives within such nations had to learn the language and speak it fluently. Apropos of this, novice speakers hired tutors from the designated country which were residing in their hometown and conversed with them in exchange for some hefty fees while living in their own land. Hence, they not required to dwell in a foreign country to learn its language.
In present, with the advent of the internet, even the most distant parts of the world are now interlinked. Moreover, with a definition of international borders and autonomous bylaws of each country, the majority of them have made, a certain level of language competency, compulsory for foreign immigrants. As a result, linguistic databases from almost all countries surfaced on the world wide web. So, anyone wanting to be fluent in a certain language can do so by signing up with an online program while sitting in their bedroom and can interact with millions through social sites.
To recapitulate, it is evident from the citations above that right from the early days to the modern world, people do not really require to be residents of the country in order to get fluent. In my opinion, albeit it is quite helpful to become fluent while living in the native country still, it is not necessary.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...faced on the world wide web. So, anyone wanting to be fluent in a certain language can ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, if, may, moreover, really, second, so, still, therefore, well, while, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1647.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93113772455 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69693346336 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586826347305 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.1418023769 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.692307692 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116216982709 0.244688304435 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0388754589704 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032881513209 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685708392028 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272707959231 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.