Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of children’s behavior and parent’s responsibility has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that youngster’s actions are not legally related to their parents, such issue is regarded parent’s responsibility by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that parents should not be blamed in this regard, and this essay will examine both sides of this view by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from a social standpoint, there are many reasons why parents should not be held accountable for their off spring’s behavior. Firstly, due to the detrimental effects of social media, such as the Internet, mass media and advertisements, they affect most of the children directly. Secondly, the role of their counterparts could not be overestimated, because students spend nearly half of their days at school. Lastly, according to an academic survey conducted by Tehran University, the impacts of computer games, mostly the violent video games, should be seen as a major role while there is not any control on them by authorities.
On the other hands, opponents argued that parents should be straightly responsible for their off spring’s acts. There is no doubt that parental control could play a pivotal role in children’s upbringing. Moreover, while many children lock at their parents as a role model, it is adult’s responsibility to be a positive and creative example for them. Due to a statistic research conducted by Melbourne University, the negative influences of not sufficient attention from parents could lead to committing a crime by juveniles.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although parental control can be effective to reduce the harms, I strongly inclined to believe that many social and environmental reasons could be affected children on their path as well.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, lastly, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51351351351 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2980656504 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564189189189 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3433183233 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.0 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349180720925 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141202618596 0.0925447433944 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890424873805 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215518611392 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739411471582 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.