Is individuals' personality affected by nurture and teaching, or genetics is more important? Give your opinion. Support your reasons with examples.
Recently the phenomenon of genetic effects of people’s personality and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of teaching and nurturing are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial numbers of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that nurture and teaching can be more effective than genetics, and this essay will examine both ideas by providing some academic evidence before the conclusion.
From a social standpoint, providing equitable resources for everyone can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that well-educated people and foster society are extremely bound up. According to an academic survey conducted by Tehran University, training and upbringing children through sufficient situation by well-educated teachers could lead to preparing young learners for the future. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both nourishment and teaching on youngsters’ personality apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of genetic science, some scientists tend to believe that genetic factors are more influential than others. They supported their idea through some valid logic that genetically clever people are the most successful in their respective community. Moreover, these opponents group based their idea on an academic research which revealed that talented people have a more positive characteristic in front of the fast-changing world. Hence, based on their idea, it is correct to presume that genetic could be an effective factor more than nurturing and teaching.
To recapitulate I pen down saying that although some opponents tend to think that genetic is the major element for people’s personality, I strongly inclined to believe that by proper teaching, everyone could lead to the right path for the bright future. However, the role of the authorities and governments to increase public awareness should not be underestimated.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1721.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75585284281 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13095284854 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581939799331 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 379.143842365 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5564363058 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.416666667 104.977214359 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1391763537 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545589875993 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401869191682 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803901321976 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319535656646 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.32886699507 123% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.