Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of experimental learning and its corresponding impacts on students sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that such issue has some detrimental drawbacks in terms of theoretical aspects, proponents regarded it as thoroughly both rewarding and constructive. I profoundly inclined to believe that practical courses should be considered by institute authorities, and this essay will examine both sides of this concern by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from an educational standpoint, some opponents argued that course syllabus and teaching curriculum should be based on theoretical method. Moreover, they tend to think that in experimental learning, assessments methods will not be accurate. According to an academic survey conducted by Tehran University, most of the students are tend to refuse practical learning due to the lack of educational systems which just prepared them by some theoretical courses such as mathematics and physics.
On the other hand, I amongst all defenders of practical learning support the idea of experimental materials through some valid logic. Firstly, they prove the high-level accuracy of educational achievement which provided by this kind of students. Secondly, believers on practical courses are tending to support that these courses can provide the opportunity for students to share their thoughts and ideas with their counterparts. Finally, according to an academic research conducted by MIT University, experimental learning could lead to improving teamwork ability in students which is a great skill in their future life. Not to mention that it could lead to social interaction and increase the positive and interactive behavior in juveniles.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that it cannot be denied that experience is a major part of every person life. Although teaching could be useful during the life of everyone, the role of experimental learning is of essential.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'tended'.
Suggestion: tended
...an University, most of the students are tend to refuse practical learning due to the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to support'
Suggestion: to support
...gst all defenders of practical learning support the idea of experimental materials thro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 31.9359605911 150% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1696.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65333333333 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10246496981 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573333333333 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3996108518 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.461538462 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940182530119 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037561651443 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407699979409 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0582055768182 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175436368103 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.