The ability to learn more than one languages will be less important in future. Do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the phenomenon of learning a new language and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of discovering the second language is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that comprehending other languages could be beneficial in wide variety areas and this essay will investigate this claim by providing some academic evidence before concluding.
On the one hand, from a cultural standpoint, multi-language speakers can provide some noticeable profits for society. Firstly, the ability to communicate with other countries, corresponding with a high place in globalization could be inferred evidently from being bilingual. Secondly, it could broaden their outlook to the new worlds. According to an academic survey conducted by the department of linguistics of Tehran University in 2015, 56% of students who could speak another language besides their mother tongue, were more successful in academic research. Thus, the beneficial ramification of learning the second language could be observed.
On the other hand, opponents claim that learning new languages, although could be beneficial in terms of globally accepted in the ever-developing world, it could be detrimental to local cultures. They use an array of valid logic to support that it could cause some cultural conflict amongst youngsters who tend to get familiar with their own nation and culture. However, it is proved by an academic research conducted by National India university that with supports from knowledgeable leaders and tutors, students could be able to benefit from learning new languages without and damages.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that learning a new language is a two-edged sword and by supporting adults, it could be not only beneficial but also rewarding for the young generation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59595959596 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12130837171 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582491582492 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8631883159 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.5 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166674064499 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068656729298 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406971710149 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10974488107 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247292543783 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.