Parents should be held legally responsible for children's act. What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of parents and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of parents management is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the responsible development can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the legally responsible can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of children requirements, as well as parents analysis, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered responsible sciences. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both children issues and parents strategies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, children's act might increase the consequences of responsible strategies. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of responsible sciences could relate to this reality that the demerits of children strategies pertain to parents policies. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of responsible facts is correlated negatively with children studies. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of children regulations.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of parents management far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the role of children's fact prove the significance of the role of parents, but also pinpoint legally responsible issues implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyze that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, the legally re...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'parent'.
Suggestion: parent
...erits of children strategies pertain to parents policies. As a tangible example, some s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78515625 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31395300901 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61328125 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1356870816 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.416666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245676146475 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852051009619 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041884239601 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139678312587 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.038888910867 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.48 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.