Parents should be held legally responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion?
Support it with personal examples.
The substantial influence of family responsibilities has sparked a controversy among the people around the globe. While specific argument claimed that family responsibilities for children are critical, a group of luminaries dispute otherwise and hold an opponent's view. I am highly inclined to believe that parents must take child's responsibilities legally. The agenda of this article is to elaborate both sides of the arguments, which clarify how it impacts pupils, family communities social support communities, and will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why family-support legalization is vital. The most remarkable one lies in the fact that it could lead to family and child social equality. Besides, recently it is alleged that child achievements have a positive correlation with their background. Hence, it is that legalizing of family support over children's responsibilities related to child needs, child outcomes, child issues, child crisis, as well child inequality.
Nevertheless, there remain drawbacks, which can unquestionably overwhelm the influence of the family social responsibilities, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that the family crisis and a single-parent family might lead to social crisis and social inequalities. From my own experience, when I was a child I suffered from my family poor-outcomes which lead to my achievements at a university. Therefore, the importance of a legal support from children's parent and its detriments which may affect social behavior, social needs, social outcomes, social achievements, social corruption, as well as social support legalization policy adversely, could be seen with clarity.
To recapitulate, while there are several compelling on both sides, my sentiment is that the benefits of legalized and supported family responsibilities on our future children far outweigh its drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70877192982 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4086233952 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554385964912 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2716545591 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.583333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15681410706 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0634844285227 0.0925447433944 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432442441988 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106295221883 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121511292676 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.