"People don't react to climate change because it is too distant. to make the change, we need to focus on the immediate: pollution and air quality." Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement. support your point of view with reason
Recently the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impact has sparked heated debate. Although contested by many that rain and pollution are highly beneficial. such issue is regarded both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals and I am inclined to believe that imdividuals effects can be plus, and I will analyze it in this essay.
From globalization and technology standpoint, changing in the atmosphere can provide society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that climate change and air pollution are so important. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I had performed academic research which discovered people effect on our world which could not be underestimated. Thus, the beneficial ramification of both government and people apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of climate change, car and factory pollution might increase the consequence of whether, Moreover fundamental aspects of government policy, relate to this reality that the disadvantage of mismanagement pertains to the desert. As a tangible example, scientific research undertaken by the prestigious university has asserted that the downside of new technology such as solar energy correlated negatively with air pollution, so it is correct to presume preconceived notions of government management.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of management, far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of clean fuel, prove the significance of climate change, but also pinpoint countries implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Such
...in and pollution are highly beneficial. such issue is regarded both constructive and...
^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ce of climate change, but also pinpoint countries implication.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, moreover, so, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65853658537 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22784705787 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646341463415 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6440099302 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.2 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132421569262 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473006260322 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391050881077 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699773657141 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391765738597 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.67 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 55.0591133005 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.