people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities,do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of the transportation system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the transportation infrastructure is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that road facilities can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, building the new road can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of dangerous roads, as well as the traffic jam, are inextricably bound up. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the traffic congestion and the transportation legislation apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the overcrowding cities might increase the consequences of city dwellers. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the capital city could relate to this reality that the demerits of the transportation cost pertain to public transports. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the transportation industry is correlated negatively with the city population. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of safer roads.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of an advanced transport system far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of private transports prove the significance of crowded cities, but also pinpoint the transportation development implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71074380165 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42019978159 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648760330579 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0660682567 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.636363636 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172933219373 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546838854959 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405661134825 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955988342818 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511752404257 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.