Protecting animals in zoos. agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the rights of animals and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that zoos is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that protecting animals can be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
From the sociological standpoint, observing the life of animals provide the society with some beneficial effects which are rooted in the fact that different types and species, as well as their habitat, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered learning usefull information about reptiles, birds, and mamals. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both school childen's passion and the conservation apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the psychological science, putting in the jail or cage might increase the consequences of lack of freedom. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the right of living related to this reality that the demerits of cruel people pertain to annoying this creatures. As a tangible example, scientific research undetaken by a prestigious university has asserted thet the dwonside of inappropriate habitant is correlated negatively with their environments. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of animals' campaigns.
To conclude, while there some compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of protecting animals far outweigh its drabacks. Not only the advantages of improving the knowledge prove the significance of it, but also pinpoint freedom implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ications of both school childens passion and the conservation apparently can be s...
^^
Line 3, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he psychological science, putting in the jail or cage might increase the consequ...
^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ence, putting in the jail or cage might increase the consequences of lack of fre...
^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...its of cruel people pertain to annoying this creatures. As a tangible example, scien...
^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its drabacks. Not only the advantages of improving the knowledge prove the signif...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61153846154 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24805585911 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669230769231 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5862421955 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.583333333 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119631468296 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0413600958895 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539305451197 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705008061305 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394650690636 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.