In recent years some websites have appeared which allow students to grade their teachers. Some people believe that this is a good idea, while others think that these websites give power to the wrong people.Choose which position you most agree with and dis

Websites that allow students to assess their teachers have been created recently due to technological development. Some people maintain that this is a productive idea, while others are concerned. This essay will discuss the reasons why it could be dangerous if it was misused.

To begin with, in the last years, the popularity of blogs and expression through websites has increased. The fact that students could write and assess freely their teachers would be dangerous if the information was false. For example, there has been cases in the US where students have published inaccurate information about their teachers, which has led to social judgment, without even checking that the information was true. As a result, these actions could end in slanders and also in unemployment.

On the other hand, these websites give voice to students to be able to express their opinion. Students will develop communicational skills in a professional environment through these assessments. If a student disagrees with a teaching style, or wants to make a suggestion to incorporate new resources in class, will be able to do so. As a result, teachers will receive feedback to improve their performance in class.

To sum up, in the last years, new websites have been created to assess teacher´s performance. Although some people agree that this is a significant progress, others believe that students should use this tool carefully. In my opinion, despite being a beneficial tool, someone should regulate what can be published, and the veracity of the content, in order to look after teacher's reputation.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while, for example, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27734375 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94500941328 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58203125 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9010118668 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2857142857 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26980899532 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936033044082 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779199713731 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165586487891 0.151781067708 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520066213958 0.0609392437508 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.