In the last years, the number of cars circulating around big cities in the world has increased significantly. Some people believe that authorities should discourage the usage of private cars, and take action to improve sustainable transport, while others think that there is a balance between different types of transport, and no changes are needed. This essay will discuss the reasons why authorities should promote the usage of bicycles, skates, scooters and subway.
To begin with, big urbanizations are experiencing troubles due to the quantity of private cars. Some of these troubles consist in traffic jams, the impossibility to find parking spaces, and a huge rise in pollution levels. As a result, people spend more time in order to get to work, and it is also harmful for our lungs.
On the other hand, some people maintain that there is no need to take action, due to a balance in the diversity of transport. What they might not be aware of, is that not only the pollution and the travel time are affected, but it is also harmful for our mental health, because it increases anxiety and aggressive behavior. For example, some countries such as Australia and New Zealand have incorporated policies to modify this situation. They have provided big cities with public electric scooters and bikes, which can be easily accessed by anyone with a smartphone.
To sum up, although there are several transport options, the usage of private cars is increasing, and authorities worldwide should take action. In my opinion, other cities in the world should copy this Australian and New Zealand idea and develop new solutions to this environmental and health problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7293422451 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578181818182 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.931034482759 644% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5615958211 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.666666667 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9166666667 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207194505462 0.242375264174 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726291402049 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060219666605 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127539754596 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0934307476401 0.0609392437508 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.